Date: 2005-09-04 12:38 am (UTC)
I haven't really looked to deeply into the circumcision thing as I live in a country that it's practically unheard of so I've never had need to. I can only really give my experience of males who are not circumcised, 1 father, 1 brother, 1 husband and 6 sons. My father served in Aiden and Yemen in the 60's for a few years while in the army, and my Grandfathers both in WWII and it was never a UK requirement to circumcise afaik...well they didn't cut there's off anyway lol
None of my sons have ever had an infection, I can't even ever recall any friends speaking of infections in their sons so I'm guessing that's just some urban legand to defend the practice.
I have heard the cervical cancer thing but it sounds kind of dubious to me. Cervical cancer is linked to the Human papillomavirus, and I don't think a foreskin would increase you chances of getting this, it's just a piece of skin. Many sexual partners can increase ones risk of getting the virus, as you are widening your base of contact, but I don't think one penis with skin or without will make any difference at all.
I haven't seen the study but there are a few well known risk factors such as smoking, use of oral contraceptives , young age at first sexual encounter and more than one sexual partner. If the study seperated out those risk factors and still found that a foreskin or lack of one increased their partners chances of having CC then that would be interesting read.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

lalicopa: (Default)
lalicopa

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23 242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 9th, 2025 07:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios